Featured Products
EPA Registered Wipes
mycolio Disinfectant Wipes are on the EPA's List N of Disinfectants for COVID-19.
Learn More
COVID Resources
Visit our COVID Resource page for a collection of resources to help navigate new regulations.
Learn More

Recent Blog Posts
-
Posted: September 03, 2025
For decades, the aluminum foil test has been the go-to method for checking ultrasonic cleaners in dental, medical, and laboratory settings. It’s simple, inexpensive, and provides a visual confirmation that cavitation, the core cleaning action of an ultrasonic unit, is happening. But as our understanding of infection prevention and control has evolved, so too has the need for more accurate, clinically relevant verification methods.
The truth is, while the foil test might tell you that your ultrasonic unit is producing bubbles, it can’t tell you whether it’s actually cleaning instruments to the standard required for patient safety. This is where soil indicators come in.
The Limits of the Foil Test
The foil test works by running the ultrasonic cycle with pieces of aluminum foil suspended in the tank, then inspecting for pitting or perfo
-
Posted: August 07, 2025
As infection control standards continue to evolve, dental professionals are seeking tools that not only meet today’s requirements but anticipate tomorrow’s demands. The maxill Process Challenge Device (PCD) stands out as a future-ready, cost-effective, and scientifically grounded solution for validating sterilizer performance in dental settings.
Designed for Real-World Sterilization Challenges
The maxill PCD is engineered to replicate one of the most difficult sterilization scenarios in dentistry: a narrow lumen, prioritizing clinical specificity over general simulation. This deliberate design closely mirrors the internal geometry of dental handpieces, ultrasonic sleeves, hollow mirror handles, and air polisher handpieces, equipment that demands the highest level of sterilization assurance.
You might ask, why not use a flat, square, or rectangular PCD
-
Posted: July 25, 2025
In dentistry, and especially in infection prevention and control (IPAC), the term “best practice” is often misunderstood. Many assume it's an optional extra, something aspirational or “above and beyond” the standards. But in reality, best practice is not about going beyond the standards, it's about fully meeting them through a responsible, evidence-informed, and risk-managed approach.
Let me explain.
When we say “best practice,” what we really mean is: meeting the standards with accountability. Best practice is about taking the regulatory standards and interpreting them through the lens of risk management, tailoring them to your specific clinical environment. It's not an abstract concept or a luxury for high-end clinics. It is the professional duty of every regulated health professional.
Why Standards Sound Vague—And Why That's Intentional
Often, standards are written broadly. This is not becaus
-
Posted: July 11, 2025
In the world of dental infection prevention and control (IPAC), the terms *guidelines* and *standards* are often used as if they mean the same thing. But should they be? And more importantly … does it matter?
Yes, it matters. A lot.
What's the Difference?
Standards are formal, enforceable requirements set by regulatory bodies. They are the minimum expectations for safe and ethical practice. Meeting these standards is not optional—they are legally binding, and failing to comply can lead to professional consequences, including disciplinary action or loss of license.
Guidelines, on the other hand, are recommendations. They are typically developed by public health agencies, expert panels, or research organizations. While not enforceable on their own, guidelines represent current best practices and offer direction on how to implement standards effectively and safely.
Why Are They Confused?